Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Country:||Saint Kitts and Nevis|
|Published (Last):||17 June 2018|
|PDF File Size:||7.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Retrieved from ” https: Territorial disputes in East, South, and Southeast Asia. More information and software credits.
Thesis S1 Uncontrolled Keywords: This research is a siparan of qualitative research using descriptive method.
The approach method use for this research is Juridical Normative. The Philippines query was totally dismissed in June when after oral hearings the court voted it down by a count of fourteen votes to one.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute – Wikipedia
In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting. Archived from the original on 5 March But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Archived from the original on 9 April This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan island.
Both of the islands were originally considered as terra nullius. The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data.
This research is kind of research literature study. Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes.
Sovereignty over the islands has been disputed by Indonesia and Malaysia since and intensified in when Indonesia discovered that Malaysia had built some tourist facilities on Sipadan island. International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes of Malaysia Islands of Sabah in llgitan law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations.
EngvarB from February Use dmy dates from February Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v. Based on the research, the writer concluded that the effect of International Court of Justice decision in Sipadan and Ligitan case between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning Sipadah boundary of the State is no longer appropriate. Collections Skripsi Sarjana .
This is confirmed in the Report of International Court of Justice August 1 to July 31,the decision of the International Court of Justice conducted through bargaining or bargaining led by the presiding judge Gilbert Guillaume of France who determined Malaysia has sovereignty over Sipadan and Ligitan islands.
Thus Malaysia is entitled to draw the base line as the boundary of its territory to the outermost point of Pulau Sipadan and Pulau Ligitan.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf. Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.
Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah.
The dispute arises from the application of ligihan principles to the determination of the boundaries of the continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which ligiran cause disputes. The reason ran this inappropriate of Regional boundary of the State Law because the existence of Sipadan and Ligitan island which become the basic decision in drawing the main baseline used as guidance to specify regional boundary of Indonesia are now belong to Malaysia.
Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative. This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Malaysia based on their “effective occupation”.